From my own, personal experience, I assume you can categorise your website design process into two sections: the style process that doesn't make use of a mockup tools, along with the one which does. Being previously on sides of this fence, I've a comprehension of methods those two processes work and even though designing without having a wireframe does work, I'd personally need to vote to be replaced by them.
Wireframing, the development of a "visual blueprint", must not be overly complicated. At the most basic, I've seen wireframes which can be simply are group of post-it notes together with the interface (UI) elements stolen them. They are then placed onto a small note to show the structural layout. Organic and natural to wireframes produced through design software and you may view a slightly more refined wireframe with the latter, but it doesn't matter how you wish to build your structural model, it feels right always exactly the same. In other words, it shows yourself, your client or some other party where things will likely be located on the page.
This can be a real-time saver in case you are producing a website for any client. Finding comfort my days of standing on "side A" with the fence, when to become a website for the client I never utilized to accomplish any wireframing process previously. The whole process consisted of: gathering requirements, spec'ing the website, creating the graphical UI then building your website in the event the design have been agreed. The main flaw I came across with this process would be the possibility of the customer wanting to change the main layout quite considerably. I'd don't have any problem when they would like to tweak things every now and then e.g. colours, make text larger, atart exercising . more images every now and then, increase the risk for video somewhat bigger (the standard stuff); nevertheless it was obviously a ton more painful whenever they then need to move to produce about for the page that directly affected the "page template". Jumping onto "side B" in the fence and producing the wired layout to the site ensures that layout might be agreed beforehand knowing that if the UI design is presented, you could possibly then just need to update the most common stuff.
The need to Spell it out for Clients
Even when presenting a wireframe to a client though, I have had occasions where they will be not wanting to sign this part off because it looks very "blocky" and "plain". "Yes it does" could be my immediate answer to this as these blocks determine where we'll put things on the lovely page in order that once you get back to me down the road when you have reviewed the graphical design, you cannot then tell me exactly why is the navigation up here and not there? Remember that, I've had clients similar to this before so even if creating a wireframe, there may be times when you continue to should spell out that is solely to obtain the layout correct first of all, then we'll apply the pretty little with it afterwards.
An Arsenal of Design Software
You don't need to necessarily know on your path around Adobe software so that you can produce some decent wireframes. I personally use a web-based tool, Cacoo, to create mine. This online software permits you to drag and drop pre-created elements on to your page. This could save a lot of time along the route.?
Much like everything web related, everyone may have their own opinion for this topic, but my own, personal preference is to use a wireframe whenever I'm designing an online site. Whether it is for any client and for my own, personal site, no matter because it ensures that the UI design is increased because you're effectively working from the template.
If you find yourself implementing a job for any client, then aiming to have Joe Bloggs sign off of the wires before you begin for the UI is part of this design procedure that I would call important making certain you maintain good budget and time management with a project.